About

Jonathan M. Feldman

Jonathan M. Feldman is a native New Yorker and grew up in Morningside Heights in Manhattan’s Upper West Side. Feldman’s principal areas of interest are studies related to democracy, economic development and demilitarization. He graduated from Bard College in 1981 where his Senior Project or undergraduate thesis examined the political organizing legacy of the New Left antiwar movement.  He studied industrial policy and regional economic development at MIT, where he received a Masters in City Planning.  He was a Corliss Lamont fellow in Economic Conversion and Disarmament under the direction of Dr. Seymour Melman at Columbia University and later helped organize with Melman and Robert Krinsky the National Commission for Economic Conversion and Disarmament in Washington, D.C. in 1987.  Feldman also helped organize a national town meeting and radio broadcast, “The U.S. After the Cold War: Claiming the Peace Dividend.”  This event took place on May 2, 1990 and involved about 64 cities and over 38 radio stations.

Feldman received a PhD at Rutgers University, where he studied under the direction Dr. Ann Markusen.  His dissertation examined the factors promoting success and failure among U.S. defense firms diversifying into civilian production.   Feldman moved to Sweden in 1997 to study diversification of the Swedish defense industry.  Feldman has studied the conversion history of the McDonnell Douglas, Grumman, Hughes and Boeing Vertol corporations.

In Sweden, Feldman’s economic studies have included analysis of diversification within the British and Swedish defense industries and spin offs, science parks and regional growth within Sweden.  He has studied Saab's unsuccessful attempts to develop wind power technology. In 2003, Feldman initiated a European Commission funded project based at the National Institute for Working Life that explored barriers towards women and immigrants gaining qualified jobs in the Information and Communications Technology sector and how these barriers could be overcome. 

Feldman's current research investigates the prospects for increasing domestic content and production in the mass transit industry of the United States.

Feldman is author of Universities in the Business of Repression: The Academic Military Industrial Complex and Central America (Boston: South End Press, 1989), various scholarly articles on economic development and the political economy of disarmament, and political analysis of militarism and economic democracy. 

Saturday, February 21, 2009

BUY AMERICA AND MASS TRANSIT RAIL PRODUCTION IN THE UNITED STATES

ARE MASS TRANSIT RAIL GOODS MADE IN THE US?

A BRIEF NOTE BY JONATHAN M. FELDMAN

INTRODUCTION

I was interviewed by Louis Uchitelle of The New York Times about U.S. mass transit production in an article published on February 21, 2009, see: "'Buy America’ in Stimulus (but Good Luck With That)," The New York Times, February 21, 2009.  Reference: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/21/business/21buy.html?pagewanted=all

To clarify the state of domestic production, I wanted to note that there are at least three main suppliers of subways to the most important market, New York City.  The level of domestic content in subway production will be addressed in greater detail in a forthcoming article in The American Prospect, April 2009.

This is not a comprehensive list, but gives an indication of some of the key suppliers of rail goods in mass transit. Starting with the subway market, there is no single U.S.–based producer, although assembly operations owned by foreign firms exist and are clustered in New York state. The main foreign suppliers of subways to the U.S. include Alstom, Bombardier, and Kawasaki (companies based in France, Canada, and Japan respectively). South Korean–based Hyundai Rotem and German-based Siemens are also key suppliers of transit vehicles.

NEW YORK STATE

Three companies--Alstom, Bombardier, and Kawasaki--have been the main suppliers of finished subway vehicles to New York City which represents the largest market for subways in the United States. Alstom has operations in Rochester and Kawasaki has a facilty in Yonkers, New York. In 1995, Bombardier opened a "new state-of-the-art 61,761-square-foot railcar assembly plant in Plattsburgh, the Company's third U.S. rail transportation equipment manufacturing facility" (see Business Wire, December 1, 1995). The Spanish mass transit builder CAF has also had operations in New York State related to subway manufacture (for Washington, D.C.). There are many manufacturers of subsystems for subways in New York State, with one key cluster of firms located in Hornell.  On Bombardier's facility, see: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1995_Dec_1/ai_17789842.

PENNSYLVANIA

In Pennsylvania, South Korean-based Hyundai Rotem has established operations in the Philadelphia area. According to a company spokesperson, the company's first two US contracts were with SEPTA and Southern California Regional Rail Authority SCRRA. The SEPTA contract was worth $271 million. The SCRRA contract (awarded April 2006) was $245 million (with all options - $300 million). Hyundai Rotem's contract with the MBTA was worth $190 million. It was awarded in the Spring 2008 with two potential options of 75 vehicles each. Another key systems integrator involved in finished mass transit vehicles in Pennsylvania is Brookville Equipment Corporation based in Brookville, Pennsylvania. The company has refurbished street cars for various cities including New Orleans, Philadelphia, and San Francisco. They also supply commuter rail systems. In Warrendale, Pennsylvania, Mitsubishi Electric Power Products, Inc. manufactures electrical and electronic products and systems including those used in mass transportation. The Boeing-Vertol Company used to make subways and light rail vehicles in Pennsylvania.

SOME OTHER SUPPLIER LOCATIONS 

Kawasaki has a manufacturing facility in Lincoln, Nebraska. Siemens Transportation Systems Inc. has a light rail manufacturing facility in Sacramento, California. Oregon Iron Works (OIW), is a new developer of street cars and is based in Portland, Oregon. OIW is completing their first prototype.

SOME POLICY QUESTIONS

Some would like to increase domestic content of mass transit goods.  This will be the subject of a meeting that will be organized by various persons including Robert E. Paaswell, Director of the University Transportation Research Center at City College in New York and the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C. 

Saturday, February 07, 2009

GREEN NEW DEAL CONFERENCE

I am presently organizing a conference on a Green New Deal in Sweden. The conference will be held March 9 and March 10, 2009 and involves political, labor, industrial and environmental leaders. Details about the conference can be found here: http://www.ekohist.su.se/?page=anewgreendeal

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

MASS TRANSIT PRODUCTION IN THE U.S.

With support from the Seymour Melman estate administered by the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C., as well as the MacArthur Foundation in Chicago, I have been investigating how defense firms attempted to develop civilian products and how the domestic-based mass transit industry could be expanded in the United States. My interest is to explore possibilities for coalitions of cities to cooperate in procurement and design (if not production) of mass transit components as part of a trajectory of making vehicles, e.g. subway cars, light rail vehicles and buses.

I have been analyzing the following questions: a) How are mass transportation agencies cultivating their user knowledge to make designs and design improvements in mass transit vehicles? b) What are possibilities for using procurement power and mass transit budgets for cities, states and regional authorities to leverage or support: component, final assembly or more integrated domestic content production? c) How can joint procurement be supported through cooperation among cities and is such cooperation limited by standardization problems or overcome by more flexible machining? d) What are the political and economic barriers to expansion of mass transportation usage?

I am interested in: (a) national best practice or otherwise interesting examples; (b) a potential case studies on specific cities’ efforts centering on the politics of advancing mass transit use and production, and (c) persons at mass transit production or design house wherever they may be located.

I was interviewed about my research by Louis Uchitelle of The New York Times in February of 2009.  Some of my research will appear in a special issue of The American Prospect in April of 2009.

Those interested in this topic are invited to consult listen to the radio interview archived at Earthbeat Radio:

http://www.earthbeatradio.org/ (Interview aired live June 6, 2006)

and to consult the following articles:

Jonathan Feldman, “The Conversion of Defense Engineers’ Skills: Explaining Success and Failure Through Customer-Based Learning, Teaming and Managerial Integration.” Chapter 18 in The Defense Industry in the Post-Cold War Era: Corporate Strategy and Public Policy Perspectives, Gerald I. Susman and Sean O'Keefe, eds. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 1998.

Jonathan Feldman, “It’s a Two-Way Street: Training and Labor-Management Cooperation,” Transitions: A Newsletter for Training and Education in the Transit Industry, Vol. 4, No. 2, Spring, 1996.

Jonathan Feldman, "A New Transportation Infrastructure Agenda for the New York Metropolitan Region," Business, Labor and Community Coalition of New York, September 1997.  This article is available at this website: http://www.webcom.com/ncecd/nytransportation.html Jonathan Feldman, “Broadening the Peace Dividend,” Society, Vol. 30, No. 4, May-June, 1993.

Monday, April 24, 2006

PUBLICATIONS OF JONATHAN M. FELDMAN

(Selective Listing)

Peer Reviewed Journal Articles

"Can British defense firms diversify?: The case of Nanoquest and the limits to dual-use theories," The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2008.

“Regional Growth and The Managerial Equation: The Political and Economic Development of Clusters and Science Parks,” European Planning Studies, Vol. 15, No. 8,  2007.

The Limits and Possibilities of Ethnic Entrepreneurship:  The Case of ICT Firms in Sweden,”  International Journal of Multicultural Studies (IJMS),  Vol. 8, No. 1,   2006.

“Towards the Post-University: Centres of Higher Learning and Creative Spaces as Economic Development and Social Change Agents,” Economic and Industrial Democracy, Volume 22, Number 1, 2001.

“Medium-Sized firms and the Limits to Growth: A Case Study in the Evolution of a Spin-Off Firm,” Co-author, Magnus Klofsten, European Planning Studies, Volume 8, Number 5, 2000.

“Extending Disarmament Through Economic Democracy,” Peace Review, “Workplace Democracy,” Summer Issue, May, Volume 12, Number 2, 2000.

“Civilian diversification, learning, and institutional change: growth through knowledge and power,” Environment and Planning A, Volume 31, Number 10, October, 1999.

Chapters in Books

Industrial Conversion: A Linchpin for Disarmament and Development. Chapter 12 in Dimensions of Peace and Security: A Reader, Gustaaf Geeraerts, Natalie Pauwels and Éric Remacle, eds. Brussels: Peter Lang, 2006.

“The Conversion of Defense Engineers’ Skills: Explaining Success and Failure Through Customer-Based Learning, Teaming and Managerial Integration.” Chapter 18 in The Defense Industry in the Post-Cold War Era: Corporate Strategy and Public Policy Perspectives, Gerald I. Susman and Sean O'Keefe, eds. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 1998.

“Public Choice, Foreign Policy Crises and Military Spending Levels,” in Finding the Future, edited by Lloyd J. Dumas. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1995.   

“Constituencies and New Markets for Economic Conversion: Reconstructing the United States Physical, Environmental and Social Infrastructure,” in   Towards a Peace Economy in the United States: Essays on Military Industry, Disarmament and Economic Conversion, edited by Gregory A. Bischak. New York: St. Martins Press, 1991.

“Converting the Military Economy Through the Local State: Local Conversion Prospects in Massachusetts” in Making Peace Possible: the Promise of    Economic Conversion, edited by Lloyd J. Dumas and Marek Thee. Oxford: Permagon Press, 1989.